- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 18 Jul 2002 13:53:18 -0500
- To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 13:40, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > TITLE: should OWL provide synonyms for RDF and RDFS objects > DESCRIPTION: The DAML+OIL official definition contains 12 sameXxxAs > statements that provide daml: synonyms for 12 resources > that are part of RDF or RDFS. This is probably a bad idea > that should not be repeated in OWL as it can lead to > confusion as to what comes from where, particularly as not > all RDF and RDFS built-in resources are so treated, and at > least one ``local name'', Class, is used in both RDFS and > OWL. > RAISED BY: Peter F. Patel-Schneider > REFERENCE: http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl.html thanks, Peter. I suggest this discharges my action. "ACTION DanC to raise an issue wrt rdfs:subclassof and owl:subclassoff" -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf3.html I suggest it subsumes the suggestion from Mike Dean about TITLE: owl:Class still needed of 17 Jul 2002 20:08:13 -0400 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 14:53:16 UTC