W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2007

R: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example

From: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:10:42 +0100
Message-ID: <F534D6940BB4C447874590AC0B29557198EDC4@PTPEVS106BA020.idc.cww.telecomitalia.it>
To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: "Baggia Paolo" <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <www-voice@w3.org>

R103-30 : Sub-elements for example

    Recent discussion:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0097.html
    
    Resolution: Deferred

We now understand your motivation better. We will consider your request in a future version of PLS, but we wouldn't apply it now because the spec is a second Last Call Working Draft.

~~~~~
Please indicate before 24 January 2007 whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 24 January, please let me know. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 24 January 2007,
we will assume that you accept our resolutions.	
~~~~~
	
Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] 
Inviato: venerd́ 15 dicembre 2006 15.22
A: Baggia Paolo; www-voice@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Oggetto: RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example

> > R103-30:
> > Resolution: Rejected
> > 
> > - You asked to add markup in the example element.
> > - We rejected it with motivations.
> > - No answer
> > 
> > + E-mail Trail
> > - Original Comment Richard Ishida (2006-03-21)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/0089.html
> > - VBWG official response to last call issue VBWG (2006-05-26)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0075.html



The i18n WG still feels that markup would be better for bidi text than
Unicode control codes, but we will not insist on this if it will force you
back to WD.

Reasons we prefer markup include:

1. start and end markers are visible, which decreases the likelihood of
errors

2. correct application of bidi information can be checked as part of the
well-formedness and validation checks on the document

3. the scope of the embeddings is easier to manage (eg. if a PDF control is
omitted after an RLE, it is not clear in marked up content where the
embedded directionality should terminate - markup makes that clear).


RI
 


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/



Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 09:10:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 January 2007 09:10:57 GMT