W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2007

R: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language

From: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:09:38 +0100
Message-ID: <F534D6940BB4C447874590AC0B29557198EDC3@PTPEVS106BA020.idc.cww.telecomitalia.it>
To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: "Baggia Paolo" <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <www-voice@w3.org>

R103-21 : dc:language

    Recent discussion:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006OctDec/0092.html 

    Resolution: Accepted
    
We will remove dc:language from the example in Section 4.3 [1].

~~~~~
Please indicate before 24 January 2007 whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution, whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection.

If you do not think you can respond before 24 January, please let me know. However, if we do not hear from you at all by 24 January 2007,
we will assume that you accept our resolutions.	
~~~~~
	
Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20061026/#S4.3

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] 
Inviato: venerd́ 15 dicembre 2006 14.38
A: Baggia Paolo; www-voice@w3.org
Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
Oggetto: RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language

> > R103-21:
> > Resolution: Rejected
> > 
> > - Request: "How is dc:language="en-US" meant to be interpreted
> >   if it appears in a metadata element? How does it affect
> >   the xml:lang declaration on PLS elements?"
> > - We rejected it, because: "We do not see any relationship
> >   between the two declarations. The attribute xml:lang is
> >   mandatory in PLS and dc:language will be ignored."
> > - No answer
> > 
> > + E-mail Trail
> > - Original Comment Richard Ishida (2006-03-21)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/0080.html
> > - VBWG official response to last call issue VBWG (2006-05-26)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0070.html 



The i18n WG feels that it will be confusing to people to see the dc:language
declaration in the example, and that one of two things should therefore
happen:

1. remove the dc:language line from the example

2. explain in the text that it is not clear what is the likely effect of
including dc:language as shown, nor how that information should relate to
the xml:lang attribute.

Cheers,
RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/



Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 09:09:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 January 2007 09:09:56 GMT