RE: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, David Brownell wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > I note you did not respond to my request to point out the mistakes, > > internal inconsistencies, and biases that you said were in my document. > > Should I assume you couldn't find any on a closer reading? > > No, you should assume I want to limit the amount of time I spend on > this. I didn't take notes when I read it, and I'd have to reread. As I use this document quite frequently, I would appreciate it if you would reread it and give me some comments. > The bias ("don't use XHTML") is pretty strong. The document doesn't say "don't use XHTML" at any point. It says "don't send XHTML as text/html". > I do remember noticing that you used one argument "against" XHTML in > one context, and in a different context where it fought "for" XHTML you > either neglected to apply it, or applied it in a way that'd have made it > "for" in the first context (applying the argument consistently). I don't believe I have any arguments against XHTML, only against sending XHTML as text/html. Maybe this isn't clear enough? > I think there were multiple instances of that I couldn't find any; I would love specific references if possible. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 02:39:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:48:46 GMT