W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-css@w3.org > November 2011

Re: The 'speech' media type

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:46:28 -0500 (EST)
To: Jordan Clark <clarky_y2k@hotmail.com>
cc: www-validator-css@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1111081138490.5038@wnl.j3.bet>
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Jordan Clark wrote:

> Thanks for that, Dan. However, what I really wanted to know is which media type ? 'aural' or 'speech' ? to use in the interim, until the CSS3 Speech Module (hopefully!) gets more widespread support among UAs and reaches Recommendation status.
> I just find the wording of the current standard a bit confusing, as it is basically ruling out *both* media types (for the present time at least):
> ?This means that a style sheet such as ['speech' example code] is valid, but that its meaning is not defined by CSS 2.1, while ['aural' example code] is deprecated, but defined by this appendix.?
> -- CSS 2.1 Specification
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/aural.html#aural-media-group
> (Perhaps I should really have sent this question to the more general CSS 
> mailing list over at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style .)

Yes, that would be better to reach to a broader mailing list like 

In the meantime, I will downgrade the 'error' to a 'warning' as it makes 
more sense in the css validator (in fact, the validation continues on 
what's inside the @media definition, so warning is definitely the best).

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jordan Clark
> Website: http://www.jdclark.org
> E-mail:  mail@jdclark.org

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 16:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:48 UTC