RE: The 'speech' media type

Thanks Yves, that is very much appreciated!

Regards,

Jordan Clark.

Website: http://www.jdclark.org
E-mail:   mail@jdclark.org


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:46:28 -0500
> From: ylafon@w3.org
> To: clarky_y2k@hotmail.com
> CC: www-validator-css@w3.org
> Subject: Re: The 'speech' media type
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Jordan Clark wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks for that, Dan. However, what I really wanted to know is which media type ? 'aural' or 'speech' ? to use in the interim, until the CSS3 Speech Module (hopefully!) gets more widespread support among UAs and reaches Recommendation status.
> >
> > I just find the wording of the current standard a bit confusing, as it is basically ruling out *both* media types (for the present time at least):
> >
> > ?This means that a style sheet such as ['speech' example code] is valid, but that its meaning is not defined by CSS 2.1, while ['aural' example code] is deprecated, but defined by this appendix.?
> > -- CSS 2.1 Specification
> >    http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/aural.html#aural-media-group
> >
> > (Perhaps I should really have sent this question to the more general CSS
> > mailing list over at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style .)
>
> Yes, that would be better to reach to a broader mailing list like
> www-style.
>
> In the meantime, I will downgrade the 'error' to a 'warning' as it makes
> more sense in the css validator (in fact, the validation continues on
> what's inside the @media definition, so warning is definitely the best).
> Thanks,
>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Jordan Clark
> >
> > Website: http://www.jdclark.org
> > E-mail:  mail@jdclark.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>
> ~~Yves
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:17:22 UTC