Next message: Dan Zigmond: "RE: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)"
Message-ID: <38FD7365.FA938B9C@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:50:45 +0800
From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
To: Dan Zigmond <djz@corp.webtv.net>
CC: "'Larry Masinter'" <LM@att.com>, uri@w3.org, www-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
this is great news ! thanks for the update
-Philipp
Dan Zigmond a écrit :
>
> Philipp,
>
> Yes, I did forward the current "tv:" spec to the IESG shortly after my last
> posting. So they are working on it.
>
> If we have some consensus around "lid:" as well, I'll certainly forward that
> too.
>
> Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Dan Zigmond
> Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
> WebTV Networks, Inc.
> djz@corp.webtv.net
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 9:07 PM
> To: Dan Zigmond
> Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
>
> Dan,
>
> i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
> forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
> was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
> time to wrap this up.
>
> -Philipp
>
> Dan Zigmond a écrit :
> >
> > Agreed. We were a little careless in our terminology (as others also
> > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the drafts.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Dan Zigmond
> > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
> > WebTV Networks, Inc.
> > djz@corp.webtv.net
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
> > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
> > Subject: "lid" URLs
> >
> > (someone) wrote me:
> >
> > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and refer to
> a
> > > URI scheme called lid:
> > >
> > > draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
> > > draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
> > >
> > > I have two thoughts:
> > >
> > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
> > >
> > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and URNs,
> but
> > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:" or
> > > namespace identifier parts).
> >
> > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like semantics,
> > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think the
> > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change, since
> > it just adds confusion.
> >
> > Larry