Re: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)

From: Philipp Hoschka (ph@w3.org)
Date: Mon, Apr 24 2000

  • Next message: Daniel Dardailler: "CfP W3C/WAP Web Device Independent Authoring workshop"

    Message-ID: <3904F0F0.86450AD@w3.org>
    Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 09:12:16 +0800
    From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
    To: Dan Zigmond <djz@corp.webtv.net>
    CC: "'Larry Masinter'" <LM@att.com>, uri@w3.org, www-tv@w3.org
    Subject: Re: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
    
    Dan,
    
    this may be an issue: I can't find the draft on the list of
    things the IESG is currently working on
    http://www.ietf.org/IESG/status.html
    
    You may want to go back and check that things didn't get lost
    somewhere.
    
    -Philipp
    
    Dan Zigmond a écrit :
    > 
    > Philipp,
    > 
    > Yes, I did forward the current "tv:" spec to the IESG shortly after my last
    > posting.  So they are working on it.
    > 
    > If we have some consensus around "lid:" as well, I'll certainly forward that
    > too.
    > 
    >         Dan
    > 
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    > Dan Zigmond
    > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
    > WebTV Networks, Inc.
    > djz@corp.webtv.net
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
    > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 9:07 PM
    > To: Dan Zigmond
    > Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
    > Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
    > 
    > Dan,
    > 
    > i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
    > forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
    > was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
    > time to wrap this up.
    > 
    > -Philipp
    > 
    > Dan Zigmond a écrit :
    > >
    > > Agreed.  We were a little careless in our terminology (as others also
    > > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the drafts.
    > >
    > >         Dan
    > >
    > > ---------------------------------------------------
    > > Dan Zigmond
    > > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
    > > WebTV Networks, Inc.
    > > djz@corp.webtv.net
    > > ---------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
    > > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
    > > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
    > > Subject: "lid" URLs
    > >
    > > (someone) wrote me:
    > >
    > > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and refer to
    > a
    > > > URI scheme called lid:
    > > >
    > > >    draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
    > > >    draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
    > > >
    > > > I have two thoughts:
    > > >
    > > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
    > > >
    > > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and URNs,
    > but
    > > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:" or
    > > > namespace identifier parts).
    > >
    > > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like semantics,
    > > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think the
    > > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change, since
    > > it just adds confusion.
    > >
    > > Larry