RE: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)

From: Dan Zigmond (djz@corp.webtv.net)
Date: Wed, Apr 19 2000

  • Next message: Michael A. Dolan: "Organizations in Markup Languages for Television"

    Message-ID: <15AAE0EBDCC9D1119FFA00805F85642E07B1A0E4@WNI-MSG-02>
    From: Dan Zigmond <djz@corp.webtv.net>
    To: "'Philipp Hoschka'" <ph@w3.org>
    Cc: "'Larry Masinter'" <LM@att.com>, uri@w3.org, www-tv@w3.org
    Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 07:35:06 -0700
    Subject: RE: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
    
    Philipp,
    
    Yes, I did forward the current "tv:" spec to the IESG shortly after my last
    posting.  So they are working on it.
    
    If we have some consensus around "lid:" as well, I'll certainly forward that
    too.
    
    	Dan
    
    --------------------------------------------------- 
    Dan Zigmond 
    Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies 
    WebTV Networks, Inc. 
    djz@corp.webtv.net 
    --------------------------------------------------- 
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:ph@w3.org]
    Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 9:07 PM
    To: Dan Zigmond
    Cc: 'Larry Masinter'; uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
    Subject: Submit TV-URI work to IESG ? (was: Re: "lid" URLs)
    
    
    Dan,
    
    i think that at least the "tv:" scheme seems to be ready to be
    forwarded to the IESG for adoption - what do you think ? There
    was not much discussion last time you did an update, so maybe it's
    time to wrap this up.
    
    -Philipp
    
    Dan Zigmond a écrit :
    > 
    > Agreed.  We were a little careless in our terminology (as others also
    > pointed out), and I just haven't gotten around to revising the drafts.
    > 
    >         Dan
    > 
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    > Dan Zigmond
    > Senior Group Manager, Client Technologies
    > WebTV Networks, Inc.
    > djz@corp.webtv.net
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Larry Masinter [mailto:LM@att.com]
    > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2000 10:33 AM
    > To: uri@w3.org; www-tv@w3.org
    > Subject: "lid" URLs
    > 
    > (someone) wrote me:
    > 
    > > I've just noticed a couple of Internet drafts that propose and refer to
    a
    > > URI scheme called lid:
    > >
    > >    draft-blackketter-lid-00.txt
    > >    draft-finseth-isanlid-00.txt
    > >
    > > I have two thoughts:
    > >
    > > (a) these lid:'s look more like URNs to me
    > >
    > > (b) the lid draft claims that lid:'s are simulatneously URIs and URNs,
    but
    > > they don't conform to URN syntax (in not having a leading "urn:" or
    > > namespace identifier parts).
    > 
    > I don't have a problem with URL-schemes that have URN-like semantics,
    > since there are enough of them already (cid, news, etc.). I think the
    > wording (saying that lid URLs are URNs) probably needs to change, since
    > it just adds confusion.
    > 
    > Larry