Re: uri-comp draft necessary? from Miles Sabin on 2002-12-19 (www-tag@w3.org from December 2002)

From: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:11:38 +0000
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <200212191811.38103.miles@milessabin.com>

Paul Prescod wrote,
> Everyone agrees we don't want to go there. Let's not go there. Next
> issue?

If we end up in a situation where we're saying that one or other of,

  <ns:foo xmlns:ns="http://www.example.com/blah/" />

and,

  <ns:foo xmlns:ns="http://WWW.EXAMPLE.COM/blah/" />

is frowned on (which one, I wonder, and why?) then we're going there 
willy nilly.

That's where this alleged "best practice" leads.

Cheers,


Miles

Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 13:12:09 UTC