W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

Re: uri-comp draft necessary?

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:23:19 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <r01050400-1022-F33FBC12137E11D7B23F0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Miles Sabin writes:
>Simon St.Laurent wrote,
>> This tension was also near the heart of the xml-uri discussions of
>> relative URI references for namespace URIs a few years back.
>
>Actually, I think this is exactly the same discussion ... which is why 
>it'd probably be a good idea not to go there.

Given that, and the volume this subject has already generated in a
period when most of the lists I follow have gone quiet, it might be wise
to give this discussion its own list - xml-uri or another.

TAG's choice, of course.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 13:22:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:14 GMT