Re: uri-comp draft necessary?

Miles Sabin writes:
>Simon St.Laurent wrote,
>> This tension was also near the heart of the xml-uri discussions of
>> relative URI references for namespace URIs a few years back.
>
>Actually, I think this is exactly the same discussion ... which is why 
>it'd probably be a good idea not to go there.

Given that, and the volume this subject has already generated in a
period when most of the lists I follow have gone quiet, it might be wise
to give this discussion its own list - xml-uri or another.

TAG's choice, of course.
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org