Re: uri-comp draft necessary?

Miles Sabin wrote:

> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote,
>
> >
> >Well, I think the question is: do the revisions mandate a change to
> >the normative processing and conformance rules for documents, or are
> >they merely health warnings.  A change to mandate RFC 2396 makes the
> >following document not namespace well-formed:
> >
> >   xmlns:p2="HTTP://example.com"
> >   p1:attr="1"
> >   p2:attr="2" />
> >
> >I really, really, really don't want to go there.
>
>
> Me neither.

Everyone agrees we don't want to go there. Let's not go there. Next issue?

  Paul Prescod