W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

Re: uri-comp draft necessary?

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:42:19 -0800
Message-ID: <3E0204FB.9020109@prescod.net>
To: Miles Sabin <miles@milessabin.com>
CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org

Miles Sabin wrote:

> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote,
>
> >
> >Well, I think the question is: do the revisions mandate a change to
> >the normative processing and conformance rules for documents, or are
> >they merely health warnings.  A change to mandate RFC 2396 makes the
> >following document not namespace well-formed:
> >
> >   xmlns:p2="HTTP://example.com"
> >   p1:attr="1"
> >   p2:attr="2" />
> >
> >I really, really, really don't want to go there.
>
>
> Me neither.

Everyone agrees we don't want to go there. Let's not go there. Next issue?

  Paul Prescod
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 12:42:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:14 GMT