Has anyone thoughts about the relative merits of the rival technologies: SVG, SMIL, Flash5? I am interested in expressed views. I have written demos using all of these technologies, now, and have found the following: 1. SVG has good interactive features, but limited audio (no streaming) and security (source code is visible). 2. SMIL has very limited interactive features (proof: Realnetworks promo for SMIL is written in Flash5!), but good audio features and security. 3. Flash5 has good security, audio and interactive features, but is expensive and is not a programming language, and therefore we are limited to developments at Macromedia. Thank you.Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 00:01:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:20 GMT