At 12:00 AM -0500 2/27/01, TOa2671644@aol.com wrote: >Has anyone thoughts about the relative merits of the rival technologies: SVG, >SMIL, Flash5? I am interested in expressed views. > >1. SVG has good interactive features, but limited audio (no streaming) and >security (source code is visible). > I consider that a feature, not a bug. The Web might never have happened if not for "View Source" -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2001 13:15:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:20 GMT