- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 11:50:49 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Kari Pihkala <kari.pihkala@gmail.com>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 2017-05-04 10:39, fantasai a écrit : > On 05/03/2017 04:21 AM, Gérard Talbot wrote: >> Le 2017-05-03 01:52, Kari Pihkala a écrit : >>>> >>>> If it's typesetting correctly in mixed orientation, but not upright, >>>> it's a browser bug. >>>> (I think this is unclear because UTR50 does not provide a data point >>>> to reference here, >>>> but the proper behavior can be derived from a combination of UTR50 >>>> data and the script >>>> tag.) >>>> >>>> ~fantasai >> >> Elika, >> >> In light of the bug reports filed by Kari, can you have a look at this >> test then: >> >> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/text-orientation-012.htm >> >> which states >> " >> This test checks that 'text-orientation: upright' causes characters >> from horizontal-only scripts and from vertical scripts to >> be translated upright. >> " > > The test looks correct, Gérard. CJK characters are to be oriented > upright. > Mongolian needs to be rotated sideways, however, because that's how > current > font technology works IIRC. So the test is correct, but it's > incomplete, > because it only looks at Latin and Han. > > ~fantasai Great! I will add this test to my to-be-updated-list then. Thank you, Gérard
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2017 15:51:28 UTC