W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [css-writing-modes] Vertical upright Mongolian intrinsic orientation

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:40:49 -0400
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <26ef187d-00cc-3ecc-78e7-4bfd795cc5c3@inkedblade.net>
On 05/03/2017 05:19 AM, Gérard Talbot wrote:
> Le 2017-05-03 01:52, Kari Pihkala a écrit :
>>>
>>> If it's typesetting correctly in mixed orientation, but not upright, it's a browser bug.
>>> (I think this is unclear because UTR50 does not provide a data point to reference here,
>>> but the proper behavior can be derived from a combination of UTR50 data and the script
>>> tag.)
>>>
>>> ~fantasai
>>
>> Thanks. I filed a bug for Firefox [1] and Chrome [2].
>>
>> I also found a test case for this (Mongolian code points
>> U+1800–U+18AF), but I don’t understand why it claims it passes for
>> Blink:
>> http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-writing-modes-3_dev/grouped/text-orientation-script-001b/
>
> Kari,
>
> I got 3 passes when I tried that test myself on 2016-11-09 with Chrome 56. I still get 3 passes with Chrome 58. You must be
> referring to the test itself. This is where I believe you should try to reach Koji Ishii, who authored that test, and notify
> him that Traditional Mongolian glyphs should not translate upright when 'text-orientation: upright' is declared.
>
> I am under the impression that it is the UTR50 document that should be reviewed and corrected here in light of what you and
> Elika have been exchanging about.

UTR50 doesn't really cover "upright" orientation. :/

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:41:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:41:36 UTC