W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [css3-exclusions] how to handle exclusion shape-inside overflow

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:03:55 -0700
To: srirama chandra sekhar mogali <srirama179@gmail.com>
CC: Bear Travis <betravis@adobe.com>, Hans Muller <hmuller@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "mvssspraveen@gmail.com" <mvssspraveen@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CCA6FEDF.18299%stearns@adobe.com>
On 10/18/12 11:31 PM, "srirama chandra sekhar mogali"
<srirama179@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Alan,
>I have a question related to shape-inside overflow content
>behavior in case of shape-padding.
>The explanation and the two diagrams you have given explains the behavior
>of overflow in normal case, but
>when there is a shape-padding, the expected behaviour is still not clear.
>Please clarify on whether the overflowing content should
>still avoid the shape-padding area or not.


I've updated the introduction of section 4.4 and the overflow paragraph in
4.4.2 to note that there is a single shape defined by the combination of
shape-inside and shape-padding, and it is that shape that is used as the
content area. I've also added shape-padding to the overflow figures.
Please let me know if these changes answer your question.


Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 20:04:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:04 UTC