W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [css3-exclusions] how to handle exclusion shape-inside overflow

From: srirama chandra sekhar mogali <srirama179@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:56:53 +0900
Message-ID: <CAF+ir89iRr4UsZZqOU5SVxfm26oxWKjETWC+5=GLdFQ_9fV7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: Bear Travis <betravis@adobe.com>, Hans Muller <hmuller@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "mvssspraveen@gmail.com" <mvssspraveen@gmail.com>
Alan,

Thanks for the quick clarification. Now the definitions are more clear even
with shape-padding.

Regards,
Sriram



On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:

> On 10/18/12 11:31 PM, "srirama chandra sekhar mogali"
> <srirama179@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Hi Alan,
> >
> >I have a question related to shape-inside overflow content
> >behavior in case of shape-padding.
> >The explanation and the two diagrams you have given explains the behavior
> >of overflow in normal case, but
> >when there is a shape-padding, the expected behaviour is still not clear.
> >Please clarify on whether the overflowing content should
> >still avoid the shape-padding area or not.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Sriram
>
> Sriram,
>
> I've updated the introduction of section 4.4 and the overflow paragraph in
> 4.4.2 to note that there is a single shape defined by the combination of
> shape-inside and shape-padding, and it is that shape that is used as the
> content area. I've also added shape-padding to the overflow figures.
> Please let me know if these changes answer your question.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
>
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 20:28:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:01 GMT