W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [css3-images] aliasing of object-fit/object-position

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:48:20 +0100
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Leif Arne Storset" <lstorset@opera.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wbkoiuihgeuyw5@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:08 +0100, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>  
wrote:

> fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> skreiv Thu, 22 Mar 2012  
> 04:35:37 +0100
>
>> On 03/09/2012 02:36 AM, Leif Arne Storset wrote:
>>>
>>> The point of aliasing is not related to what was published. Rather,  
>>> what's important is what was implemented.
>>>
>>> Having said that, it is really HP that has to speak up if this  
>>> aliasing is to be kept. If their printers or drivers don't need
>>> this for backward compat, we should just drop it.
>>
>> The CSSWG discussed this issue today and resolved to shift the aliasing
>> definition from CSS3 Images to the CSS Print Profile. The minutes are
>> available here:
>>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0504.html
>>
>> Please let me know if you find this acceptable.
>
> It was Erik Dahlström who originally raised the issue. Erik, do you find  
> it acceptable?

Sure, that's fine.

-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:49:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 03:48:53 GMT