- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:48:20 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Leif Arne Storset" <lstorset@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:32:08 +0100, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com> wrote: > fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> skreiv Thu, 22 Mar 2012 > 04:35:37 +0100 > >> On 03/09/2012 02:36 AM, Leif Arne Storset wrote: >>> >>> The point of aliasing is not related to what was published. Rather, >>> what's important is what was implemented. >>> >>> Having said that, it is really HP that has to speak up if this >>> aliasing is to be kept. If their printers or drivers don't need >>> this for backward compat, we should just drop it. >> >> The CSSWG discussed this issue today and resolved to shift the aliasing >> definition from CSS3 Images to the CSS Print Profile. The minutes are >> available here: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0504.html >> >> Please let me know if you find this acceptable. > > It was Erik Dahlström who originally raised the issue. Erik, do you find > it acceptable? Sure, that's fine. -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:49:01 UTC