- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:07:45 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 2/24/12 1:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > This is fine, actually. Even if the property that caused it to be not > rendered is inherited (and switching off the inheritance would return > it to being rendered), it's already in the "draw as a paint source" > clause. As a paint source, it uses its intrinsic appearance, which is > completely unaffected by layout. This is an incredibly huge pain to implement in the face of dynamic chages, because to do dynamic changes properly you need a useful concept of the "old style", and you're completely breaking that because the "old style" suddenly has circular dependencies on itself. This approach is not workable as currently written, imo. -Boris
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 18:08:15 UTC