W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: wading into the Prefix morass...

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:51:28 +1100
Message-ID: <4F43BD80.1020007@css-class.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
On 22/02/2012 2:40 AM, David Singer wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:40 , Alan Gresley wrote:
>
>> On 21/02/2012 7:06 AM, David Singer wrote:
>>
>>> I agree, it would be most helpful if they then *evangelized* the CSS
>>> prefix and 'ceased to mention' their old vendor prefixed version.  Is
>>> that what you are asking?
>>
>> David. When using Safari 5, iPhone 4 (which I don't have), Chrome 17 or even Firefox 10, I should *not see* a box-shadow in the below test.
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand what point you are trying to make.  Can you explain?
>
> thx

Once a browser supports a property that is un-prefixed (like box-shadow 
or border-radius), it should drop support for itís prefixed counterpart.


-- 
Alan Gresley
http://css-3d.org/
http://css-class.com/
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 15:52:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT