W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: wading into the Prefix morass...

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:40:12 -0800
Cc: "www-style@w3.org Style" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <2C4EA0FD-6EE1-422D-AF2E-9EFED17CB9E7@apple.com>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>

On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:40 , Alan Gresley wrote:

> On 21/02/2012 7:06 AM, David Singer wrote:
> 
>> I agree, it would be most helpful if they then *evangelized* the CSS
>> prefix and 'ceased to mention' their old vendor prefixed version.  Is
>> that what you are asking?
> 
> David. When using Safari 5, iPhone 4 (which I don't have), Chrome 17 or even Firefox 10, I should *not see* a box-shadow in the below test.

I'm sorry, I don't understand what point you are trying to make.  Can you explain?

thx

> 
> <!doctype html>
> 
> <style type="text/css">
> div {
>  margin: 2em;
>  padding: 1em;
>  border: solid black;
>  -webkit-box-shadow: 1em 1em 1em black;
>  -khtml-box-shadow: 1em 1em 1em black;
>  -moz-box-shadow: 1em 1em 1em black;
>  -ms-box-shadow: 1em 1em 1em black;
>  -o-box-shadow: 1em 1em 1em black;
> }
> </style>
> 
> <div>Prefix morass</div>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alan Gresley
> http://css-3d.org/
> http://css-class.com/

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 15:41:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT