W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

RE: [css3-background]Positioning of box-shadow blurs?

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:02:15 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FA122FEC823D524CB516E4E0374D9DCF014EA007@TK5EX14MBXC136.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> It's "outside".  The solid portion of the shadow is unaffected by the blur.

I couldn't find any discussion of the direction the blur, um, spreads in the spec.  It seems like it should be there.


# The third length is a blur radius. Negative values are not allowed.
# If it is 0, the shadow is sharp, otherwise the larger the value,
# the more the shadow is blurred. The exact algorithm is not specified.

These are the only two references to "blur" that I see in the spec.

Additional note:
Can we use a word other than "sharp" in this quote?  "The shadow is sharp" could easily be confused with "sharp corners".

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 02:04:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:34 UTC