W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-page] Stability of sections of Paged Media

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:46:28 -0700
Message-ID: <g2udd0fbad1004091046u47d78957z9e780caa1fb37267@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:25 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 04/08/2010 10:52 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:34 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Visibility inherits, so you can just write
>>>  @page {
>>>    visibility: hidden;
>>>  }
>>> and that will apply to all the margins. Now, if you happen to be setting
>>> @page backgrounds or borders, you'll lose those, too, but if you're not,
>>> it will have the effect of hiding all margin boxes.
>>
>> Ah, gotcha.  Didn't realize that the margin boxes were children of
>> @page in the box tree.  That won't hide the page area too?
>
> I don't think it should. (That would be kinda useless, no?) Remind me
> to clarify css3-page to specify that.

I agree it would be useless, it just seemed sorta logical that the
page area was a child of @page.  Nothing's stopping you from setting
visibility:visible on <html>, of course.  ^_^

~TJ
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 17:47:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT