W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation, do we need to change the process?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:35:37 -0700
Message-ID: <p2udd0fbad1004080835nd3f38331y8891027db853100e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, seriously: wouldn't be appropriate to set up a FAQ-like page to
> put all these things together? Things that could go there include:
> - Conventions, such as that one.
> - What is welcome from external contributors.
> - What is *not* welcome from external contributors (spam, flaming, and
> trolling are the obvious ones, but also "How do I?" questions, and
> possibly other stuff, you'll  know better than me).
> - Links to the resources for the most common things that are sent here
> but should go somewhere else.
> - Advise on how to structure postings (for example, if you look at the
> WHATWG's FAQ [1], it takes a few lines to explain the difference
> between top-posting and inline replying, and why the later is
> preferred). Also, some guidance on how to describe use-cases and
> requirements would be useful.
>
> IMO, there should be an easily findable place gathering all this kind
> of stuff together.
> As this thread has been going on, I have grown to realize that the
> only real issue about the W3C's process is the lack of proper
> understanding of the process by the potential contributors.

Makes sense to me.  I won't have time today or tomorrow, but I'll get
this written up by sometime next week.

Or, you know, you could write it.  ^_^

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:36:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT