- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:25:34 -0800
- To: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- CC: Www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Zack Weinberg wrote: > Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > >> The CSS WG published a new working draft of the "Backgrounds and >> borders" module: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-background-20091015/ >> >> This is intended to be the last draft before changing the status to >> Candidate Recommendation and thus this should also be the last call >> for comments. > > It seems to me that the border-image shorthand would be more user > friendly if it allowed slashes between any two option groups. > Something like > > <‘border-image-source’> || /? <‘border-image-slice’> > [ / <‘border-image-width’>? [ / <‘border-image-outset’> ]? ]? > || /? <‘border-image-repeat’> > > I *think* this does not make the grammar ambiguous, and it means > authors don't have to remember which blocks take slashes and which > don't. The CSS Working Group has discussed your proposal and decided not to make this change. You can read the minutes of the discussion here: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0265.html> Please let me know if this is acceptable. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 19 November 2009 21:26:18 UTC