From: "HċkonWium Lie" <howcome@opera.com> > Also sprach Chris Wilson: > > > >You could e.g. start by responding to this proposal: > > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0412.html > > > 3. (linking to "standard" TTF/OTF files) As previously indicated, I > > don't see any way to make this palatable (without requiring > > additional bits in the TTF/OTF that say this usage is allowed, that > > would not be set in most commercial fonts - e.g. "does not work > > with any current fonts, freeware fonts would have to be updated.") > > So, you're arguing that other browser -- who currently support open > formats -- should add support for an obfuscated format, but Microsoft > -- who currently supports an obfuscated format in IE -- is not willing > to support open formats in IE? > > If so, you remove much of the motivation for a font compromise. IE seems to support TTF/OTF file on my computer. http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-webfonts/test-georgian-ucnobi.htmlReceived on Friday, 26 June 2009 21:40:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:19 GMT