Also sprach Chris Wilson: > >You could e.g. start by responding to this proposal: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0412.html > 3. (linking to "standard" TTF/OTF files) As previously indicated, I > don't see any way to make this palatable (without requiring > additional bits in the TTF/OTF that say this usage is allowed, that > would not be set in most commercial fonts - e.g. "does not work > with any current fonts, freeware fonts would have to be updated.") So, you're arguing that other browser -- who currently support open formats -- should add support for an obfuscated format, but Microsoft -- who currently supports an obfuscated format in IE -- is not willing to support open formats in IE? If so, you remove much of the motivation for a font compromise. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcomeReceived on Friday, 26 June 2009 21:26:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:16:15 GMT