W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: [css3-background] proposed box-shadow syntax

From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 10:50:44 -0700
Cc: Eli Morris-Heft <dai@doublefishstudios.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A79A7DA6-8C1B-42A1-9EB2-AB06A5E7DF83@comcast.net>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>

On May 10, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Brad Kemper wrote:

>> box-shadow: 6px 6px 6px green;  /* 6px blur, not supporting spread */
>> box-shadow: 6px 6px 2px green; /* two pixel blur and spread */

Oh yeah, and...

Neither one of those 2 examples would show any spread. The third  
measurement would always be blur. Spread would be the fourth, which  
you don't have there. So I don't know why you would want two different  
blur values based on spread support, if you are not specifying spread.

It looks like you are saying that the 2px would be used for both blur  
and spread, but that is not what I proposed. If no spread is  
specified, then it would default to zero, and look the same as with  
the current spec.
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2008 17:51:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:36 UTC