W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2008

Re: [css3-background] proposed box-shadow syntax

From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 10:36:39 -0700
Cc: Eli Morris-Heft <dai@doublefishstudios.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D3D4CC6E-1DBD-456A-8490-23225175CDED@comcast.net>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>


On May 9, 2008, at 10:39 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:

> Brad Kemper wrote:
>
>> 6. box-shadow: 2px 2px 6px 1px red;       /* same as #1 above, but  
>> with a 1px spread */
>> 7. box-shadow: 6px 6px 2px 1px green;       /* same as #5 above,  
>> but with a 1px spread */
>
>
> Ok, I code.
>
>
> box-shadow: 6px green;
>
>
> but I tell you that for implementations that support spread, I would  
> want a different type blur. So like.

Well, box-shadow is still in draft status, so we can simply say that  
supporting box-shadow means supporting spread.

Properties preceded with -webkit- are subject to change, and subject  
to breakage when they change.

>
>
> box-shadow: 6px 6px 6px green;  /* 6px blur, not supporting spread */
> box-shadow: 6px 6px 2px green; /* two pixel blur and spread */
>
>
> Having four value before the color is overloading the that part of  
> the declaration.

I respectfully disagree.

>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 10 May 2008 17:37:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:06 GMT