W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2008

Re: [CSS21] stack level definitions in 9.9.1

From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:07:01 +0200
Message-ID: <732E31C8FF62419EA43059E90B72096A@fremycompany>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Anton Prowse" <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>

I propose that we also can have a "position-stack"
property with the following values :

    - [initial] "auto" : A new local stacking context is
    created as the rules are defined in CSS 2.1/3.0
    (computed to "create-new" if a new stacking context is
    needed, to "keep-old" otherwhise).

    - "create-new" : A new local stacking context is created
    anytime (top/left/right/bottom of children now refer
    to positions relatives to the element, even if these
    element is not a float or absolutely positionned
    element)

    - "keep-old" : No new stacking context is created even
    if the element is absolutely positionned or floated
    (top/left/right/bottom of children now refer to
    positions relatives to the nearest stacking context).

<div style="position-stack: create-new; margin: 10px; width: 110px; height: 
20px; background: blue">
    <div style="position: absolute; top: 5px; left: 5px; width: 100px; 
height: 10px; background: white;"></div>
</div>

===>

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!                                                  !!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fremy

--------------------------------------------------
From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 2:31 PM
To: "Anton Prowse" <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [CSS21] stack level definitions in 9.9.1

>
> On Tuesday 2008-05-20 00:46 +0200, Anton Prowse wrote:
>> Due to the number of problems involved, I have taken the unusual step of
>> presenting and analysing them in a separate paper rather than treating
>> them here on this mailing list:
>> http://dev.moonhenge.net/css21/spec/z-index/ .  The paper presents
>> several proposals for the clarification of the relevant sections of the
>> specification.  In summary, the issues addressed are:
>
> Could you post a frozen (will never be changed) copy of this
> document somewhere?  Preferably by emailing it as an attachment to
> www-archive@w3.org, which will make it show up at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/ ?  It's very
> difficult to comment on a document that's changing over time.
>
> -David
>
> -- 
> L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
> Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
> 
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 17:07:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:11 GMT