François REMY wrote: > > I propose that we also can have a "position-stack" > property with the following values : > > - [initial] "auto" : A new local stacking context is > created as the rules are defined in CSS 2.1/3.0 > (computed to "create-new" if a new stacking context is > needed, to "keep-old" otherwhise). > > - "create-new" : A new local stacking context is created > anytime (top/left/right/bottom of children now refer > to positions relatives to the element, even if these > element is not a float or absolutely positionned > element) > > - "keep-old" : No new stacking context is created even > if the element is absolutely positionned or floated > (top/left/right/bottom of children now refer to > positions relatives to the nearest stacking context). > [..] Francoiss, can you clearly state why there are problems in the current spec for the *block formating context* (with test cases). I can only see issues concerning *overflow*. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power - Abraham Lincoln Save the Internet - http://www.savetheinternet.com/Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 03:39:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:11 GMT