On Jul 20, 11:29pm, Hakon Lie wrote: > Lee wrote > > While that's a good definition, typesetting practice /never/ uses "em" > > as vertical measurement; an em is a horizontal measurement only, and an > > "ex" is the vertical measurement. So why the term 'em square'? > > This makes measurements based on > > fonts size work with compressed an/or fat fonts. That is a reasonable point. However, in CSS1, a highly stretched 12pt font and a highly condensed 12pt font would both have an em size of -- 12pt. So, that case already works. -- Chris Lilley, W3C [ http://www.w3.org/ ] Graphics and Fonts Guy The World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/people/chris/ INRIA, Projet W3C chris@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 93 65 79 87 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, FranceReceived on Monday, 21 July 1997 10:09:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:50 GMT