W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Camera Ontology - here it is!

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:12:48 -0700
Message-ID: <001801c30369$f93b5350$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
camera.owl looks good!

Just one minor comment.
If you were to distinguish subClasses of Property:
    part
    attribute
    action
    relation
    interaction
"optics" and "carriage" would be subClasses of "part",
not of "attribute".
============ 
Dick McCullough 
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Roger L. Costello 
  To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org 
  Cc: Costello,Roger L. 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 8:19 AM
  Subject: Camera Ontology - here it is!



  Hi Folks,

  Many thanks to the people who contributed suggestions on how to model
  camera data!  I have taken all your input and composed (I think) a
  pretty respectable, simple, Camera Ontology.

  Here is the URL to a graphical view of the Camera Ontology:

      http://www.xfront.com/camera/sld001.htm

  Here is the URL to two physical expressions of the Camera Ontology:

     http://www.xfront.com/camera/Query.xml
     http://www.xfront.com/camera/Hunts.xml

  Here is the URL to the actual Camera Ontology:

     http://www.xfront.com/camera/camera.owl

  Please let me know if you have suggestions on how to further improve
  it.  Thanks again!  /Roger
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 12:13:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT