On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 11:19, Roger L. Costello wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Many thanks to the people who contributed suggestions on how to model > camera data! I have taken all your input and composed (I think) a > pretty respectable, simple, Camera Ontology. > > Here is the URL to a graphical view of the Camera Ontology: > > http://www.xfront.com/camera/sld001.htm > > Here is the URL to two physical expressions of the Camera Ontology: > > http://www.xfront.com/camera/Query.xml > http://www.xfront.com/camera/Hunts.xml > > Here is the URL to the actual Camera Ontology: > > http://www.xfront.com/camera/camera.owl Nice work. > Please let me know if you have suggestions on how to further improve > it. Thanks again! /Roger One improvement you might want to consider is to add assertions for the ontology itself. For an example, see: http://rdfschema.info/2003/submit Adding rdfs:isDefinedBy to the terms can be useful too. Hum... not sure on the namespace: http://www.camera.org# might need some path before a #, maybe: http://www.camers.org/# instead. -- Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/ Redfoot.net, http://redfoot.net/ RDFLib.net, http://rdflib.net/Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 22:06:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT