Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net> wrote: > So the inference mechanism would be centralised? If so then I suppose the > problem here boils down to propagating the updates in a way that maintains > the transaction idea. The effects that (potentially) lead to infinite loops > could be a devil to calm (a distributed inference system could cause the > same problems) - though as you seem to be swuggesting, one step at a time... Whoa there -- we don't have to worry about inference yet. Let's just try and get the data to move. Inference can be done locally, and not thrown back into the stream to prevent looping. > BTW, were you thinking of hacking the inference mechanism together or using > an existing tool/shell (e.g. Jess)? Hacking. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2001 14:22:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:47 GMT