W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2001

RE: Decentralized RDF Distribution

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:22:14 -0800
Message-ID: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C199CD62@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "'Aaron Swartz'" <aswartz@upclink.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hey, FWIW I have just decided to do something similar (and I give credit to
Dan for saying it first on rss-dev), but not using any sort of XML format at
this time -- just plain ol' triples.
http://joshua.editthispage.com/2001/02/18

I just want to throw a few simple tools together to prove out the concept
and then see how generic XML formats can be used..

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Swartz [mailto:aswartz@upclink.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 9:31 PM
> To: RDF Interest
> Subject: Decentralized RDF Distribution
> 
> URI: http://logicerror.com/decentralizedRDF
> 
> **Introduction and Overview
> 
> As people get their brains in gear with new RDF[1] ideas, I'd like to
> propose one of my own. It's a cross between an RDF testbed, a demo and
> an interoperability checker. Here's the idea: A reasonable goal for
> RDF should be to implement basic database functions (insert, update,
> delete) in a decentralized fashion. I'd appreciate comments and
> pointers to related work to me[2] or www-rdf-interest@w3.org[3].
> 
> The utility of this kind of system is obvious -- there are many
> situations where people have data which they'd like to be widely
> distributed in a decentralized fashion. To simplify the problem, we
> can assume that all everyone involved is trusted (eliminating trust)
> and that we know who everyone else is (eliminating discovery). We'll
> also forget about the case where two changes to the system conflict.
> 
> Here's what such a system would look like: You have a number of nodes
> with RDF storage systems and interfaces to the distribution system. To
> make a change to the database, you make it on your local copy and then
> distribute it to the other nodes. Within a reasonable lag time all of
> the databases will be synchronized.
> 
> **Integration with RDF
> 
> ***Inserts
> 
> Inserts (adding triples) has been already solved. To insert data to
> the decentralized database, you simply publish it to the Web at a
> well-known location.
> 
> ***Updates and Deletes
> 
> Updates (modifying triples) and deletes (removing triples) are more
> difficult, and require entering an area that RDF has been afraid to
> touch: time. Most RDF systems do not factor time into the equation, or
> at least, they do it in a simplistic way.
> 
> The simplistic way to manage this would be to assign each triple a URI
> and then publish updated information on each of the statements.
> However, by doing this, we run into the tricky problem of both
> asserting and reifying a statement at the same time. _@@ reification
> experts should let me know how to do this_
> 
> **Related Links
> 
>  - Finding RDF Services (or: imminent death of usenet predicted)[4] -
> Daniel Brickley[5] proposes a decentralized system for distributing
> RDF via USENET.
> 
> [1] http://logicerror.com/rdf
> [2] mailto:aaron@logicerror.com
> [3] mailto:www-rdf-intereste@w3.org
> [4] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/message/663
> [5] http://logicerror.com/danbri
> 
> --
> Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| ...schoolyard subversion...
>   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |  because school harms kids
> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237|  http://aaronsw.com/school/
Received on Monday, 19 February 2001 15:12:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT