W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

RE: language and adoption

From: dehora <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:04:19 +0100
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCEBKOHMHCKKIAAPKLLMCEPICEAA.bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
: Brian McBride:
: I'd like to take the opportunity of Bill's message to remind folks
: of the RDFCore groups charter:
: 
:   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCoreWGCharter
: 
: which states:
: 
:   The role of the RDFCore WG is to prepare the way for such work by
:   stabilizing the core RDF specifications. The RDF Core WG is neither
:   chartered to develop a new RDF syntax, nor to reformulate the RDF
: model.
: 
: We are working on RDF 1.1 rather than 2.0, though hopefully, we are
: moving
: things along in the right direction.
: 
: I think this is in keeping with what Bill was suggesting.

Hi Brian,

I jumped the gun there! 

It seems though, that RDF is often under criticism 
from those that believe it expresses too much, and 
those that believe it expresses too little. That's 
a difficult place to be. Personally I'm never sure 
which it is, if indeed it's either.

(My apologies, 1.1 will do nicely)

regards,
Bill de hOra 
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 15:07:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT