W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

Re: language and adoption

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:11:48 +0100
Message-ID: <3ADB43F4.4404B7B9@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: dehora <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Bill,

Appologies are certainly not necessary.  I'm kinda looking forward
to 2.0 myself.

Brian


dehora wrote:
> 
> : Brian McBride:
> : I'd like to take the opportunity of Bill's message to remind folks
> : of the RDFCore groups charter:
> :
> :   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCoreWGCharter
> :
> : which states:
> :
> :   The role of the RDFCore WG is to prepare the way for such work by
> :   stabilizing the core RDF specifications. The RDF Core WG is neither
> :   chartered to develop a new RDF syntax, nor to reformulate the RDF
> : model.
> :
> : We are working on RDF 1.1 rather than 2.0, though hopefully, we are
> : moving
> : things along in the right direction.
> :
> : I think this is in keeping with what Bill was suggesting.
> 
> Hi Brian,
> 
> I jumped the gun there!
> 
> It seems though, that RDF is often under criticism
> from those that believe it expresses too much, and
> those that believe it expresses too little. That's
> a difficult place to be. Personally I'm never sure
> which it is, if indeed it's either.
> 
> (My apologies, 1.1 will do nicely)
> 
> regards,
> Bill de hOra
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 15:11:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT