- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:18:42 +0100
- To: dehora <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
dehora wrote: > > Hi, > > Reading rdf-ig over the last week made me go back and > a paper by Guy Steele, which in turn bounced me to a > Richard Gabriel essay. It's interesting to consider > RDF in light of these two essays, as it moves into > version 2.0. I'd like to take the opportunity of Bill's message to remind folks of the RDFCore groups charter: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCoreWGCharter which states: The role of the RDFCore WG is to prepare the way for such work by stabilizing the core RDF specifications. The RDF Core WG is neither chartered to develop a new RDF syntax, nor to reformulate the RDF model. We are working on RDF 1.1 rather than 2.0, though hopefully, we are moving things along in the right direction. I think this is in keeping with what Bill was suggesting. Brian
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 14:18:28 UTC