Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET

"Alberto Reggiori (vaio)" <alberto.reggiori@jrc.it> writes:

> A list of requirements could be the following:
> 
> - specified using IDL interfaces
> - bindings into the major languages (Java, Phyton, Perl, C, C++, C# and so on)
> - layered - e.g. core, parsing, storing, querying, services and protocols
> - support either statement and resource centric views
> - be event based
> - must support signatures, digests
> - possibly have a SOAP interface
> - be easy to use and understand for the programmer

I think that Wraf ( http://www.ucn.nu/wraf/ ) are in many ways
diffrent from other RDF implementations.  Interoperability are
importent, and that require a common view on how to model a lot of
things.  There should be common concepts.  

But what would be the point with identical APIs?  Wraf is not a
generic RDF library.  It's aimed at a very specific implementation
style.

-- 
/ Jonas Liljegren

The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/
Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/