- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- Date: 12 Nov 2000 19:53:55 +0100
- To: "Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org>
- Cc: "www-rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
"Jason Diamond" <jason@injektilo.org> writes: > > Two RDF APIs are considered interoperable whenever: > > 1) System A writes statements in RDF > > 2) System B reads the statements from (1) and stores them in triples > > 3) System B writes the resultant triples from (1) back out in RDF > > 4) System A reads the statements from (3) > > 5) The triples in system A remain the same. > > Even if we canonicalized the XML, the RDF syntax is far too flexible > to simply compare files. Literal objects could appear as either > attributes or elements. Resource objects could be nested inside a > property or simply referenced from it. Do we need a Canonical RDF? It's not the files that has to be the same. The suggestion was that the resulting triples should be the same. -- / Jonas Liljegren The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Sunday, 12 November 2000 13:52:50 UTC