W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: TimBL: RDF assertions should be accountable

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:04:19 +0000
Message-ID: <3AADE293.F47B4981@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
CC: RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, timbl@w3.org
Aaron,

Thank you for drawing attention to this issue.  Do you consider this
already covered by:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-interpretation

or is there something more?

Brian


Aaron Swartz wrote:
> 
> I remember Tim speaking about this at the RDF IG F2F (but I can't find it in
> my notes) -- as I recall it was something like this:
> 
>     TimBL: We need to be sure that RDF has a clause in it that you can be
>     held responsible for the triples you assert. We didn't do this in HTTP,
>     and we should have.
> 
>     GK?: That's no good -- what if I wanted to have a page of myths.
> 
>     Aaron, others: Well then reify them.
> 
> Of course Tim was much more eloquent. Anyway, I wanted to get this saved.
> Does it belong on the issues list?
> --
> Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| ...schoolyard subversion...
>   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |  because school harms kids
> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237|  http://aaronsw.com/school/
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2001 04:03:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:27 GMT