W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: TimBL: RDF assertions should be accountable

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:18:54 -0500
Message-ID: <06f501c0ac24$bd928470$c1defea9@CREST>
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com>
Cc: "RDF Comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Aaron, Brian,

Yes that  is the same issue.  In the meeting I wasn't sure it was already in
the list

Tim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com>
Cc: "RDF Comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>; <timbl@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:04 AM
Subject: Re: TimBL: RDF assertions should be accountable


> Aaron,
>
> Thank you for drawing attention to this issue.  Do you consider this
> already covered by:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-interpretation
>
> or is there something more?
>
> Brian
>
>
> Aaron Swartz wrote:
> >
> > I remember Tim speaking about this at the RDF IG F2F (but I can't find
it in
> > my notes) -- as I recall it was something like this:
> >
> >     TimBL: We need to be sure that RDF has a clause in it that you can
be
> >     held responsible for the triples you assert. We didn't do this in
HTTP,
> >     and we should have.
> >
> >     GK?: That's no good -- what if I wanted to have a page of myths.
> >
> >     Aaron, others: Well then reify them.
> >
> > Of course Tim was much more eloquent. Anyway, I wanted to get this
saved.
> > Does it belong on the issues list?
> > --
> > Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| ...schoolyard subversion...
> >   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |  because school harms kids
> > AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237|  http://aaronsw.com/school/
>
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2001 20:20:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:27 GMT