W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > February 2005

RE: [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting

From: Cameron Stillion <camerost@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:51:20 -0800
Message-ID: <1198328AFDBF5841B27E40C40C331537027C64F2@df-chewy-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <pregen@egenconsulting.com>, <Robert_Ransdell@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: "Calsify" <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>, <ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org>, <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>

Wow, now I'm intrigued.  You mean to say that the interop we just had
didn't include Apple's product? I think most of the development and
testing I've done in the last year has been interoping with that single
product.  Am I the only one?

By the way, I hate their implementation of timezones.

cameron 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org
[mailto:ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org] On Behalf Of
pregen@egenconsulting.com
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 2:37 PM
To: Robert_Ransdell@notesdev.ibm.com
Cc: Calsify; ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org;
www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting

Robert, I've been getting some private emails that say it's based on
iCalendar.  So, now I'm intrigued.  iCalendar is also based on vCalendar
as well.  I'd really love to see them participate on interops so we
could see, first hand, what actually does or does not work.



Robert_Ransdell@notesdev.ibm.com
02/24/2005 07:35 PM

To
pregen@egenconsulting.com
cc
Calsify <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>,
ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org, Tim Hare <TimHare@comcast.net>,
www-rdf-calendar@w3.org Subject
Re: [Ietf-calsify] Re:  Google Speculation, but interesting







Actually original was not iCalendar at all.  It  vCalendar 1.0 September
18, 1996 which seems to be what apple uses. 



pregen@egenconsulting.com 
Sent by: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org 
02/24/2005 07:21 PM 


To
Tim Hare <TimHare@comcast.net> 
cc
Calsify <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org, 
ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org 
Subject
Re: [Ietf-calsify] Re:  Google Speculation, but interesting








I think the item on the Blog is about iCal - which is the Apple
standard. 
The apple standard is based on the original work but it's not iCalendar.
___________________
Patricia Egen Consulting
www.egenconsulting.com
423-875-2652



Tim Hare <TimHare@comcast.net> 
Sent by: ietf-calsify-bounces@osafoundation.org
02/24/2005 04:51 PM

To
Calsify <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
cc

Subject
[Ietf-calsify] Re:  Google Speculation, but interesting






This is interesting... some months ago (3-4?) I sent in a suggestion to 
Google that they develop a specialized search for calendar information, 
and 
I specifically suggested that they had such clout that they could boost 
calendar standardization and iCalendar. Maybe one of their software 
engineers got interested on his/her own.  In any event, Google's
interest 
in calendar can only help propel things along.

Cross posted to ietf-calsify and rdf-calendar because I got two separate

posts about this on the same day.




Tim Hare
Interested Bystander, Non-Inc. 


_______________________________________________
Ietf-calsify mailing list
Ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify

_______________________________________________
Ietf-calsify mailing list
Ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify

_______________________________________________
Ietf-calsify mailing list
Ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2005 06:11:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:45 GMT