W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > February 2005

RE: [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting

From: Cyrus Daboo <daboo@isamet.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:48:17 -0500
To: Cameron Stillion <camerost@exchange.microsoft.com>, pregen@egenconsulting.com, Robert_Ransdell@notesdev.ibm.com
cc: Calsify <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <95EF22638014502C02E074BE@ninevah.local>

Hi Cameron,

--On February 27, 2005 7:04:13 PM -0800 Cameron Stillion 
<camerost@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:

> While I appreciate the semantic difference between these two application
> verbs - most users are not quite that savvy. The result? Most of the ics
> files published to apple.com (and icalshare.com) are NOT of the
> Export... flavor - and that means most people are not including what is
> needed for interop.  You must admit it is at least user unintuitive, and
> at worst a little sloppy.
>

Sure - if they 'publish' invalid iCalendar data then that is a real interop 
problem. Hopefully someone has complained to them about it and they will 
fix it...

-- 
Cyrus Daboo
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 04:48:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:45 GMT