W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Chandler Calendar

From: Katie Capps Parlante <capps@osafoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:06:01 -0700
Message-ID: <3EA9B149.5070900@osafoundation.org>
To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org

Hi Libby.

Sure, I'd be glad to talk about Chandler and RDF in an IRC chat sometime.

Cheers,
Katie

Libby Miller wrote:
> Thanks for delurking Katie :)
> Perhaps you could tell us about Chandler and RDF in an IRC chat
> sometime?
> 
> Libby
> 
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hello all,
>>
>>I thought I'd introduce myself. I'm Katie Capps Parlante, and I'm
>>working at OSAF on Chandler's calendar parcel, among other things.
>>
>>I've been lurking on this list for a few months, and have generally been
>>paying attention to your work. Many thanks, actually, its really helped
>>me get my head around RDF and some calendar issues.
>>
>>Indeed, RDF is very similar in spirit to what we want to do with
>>Chandler, "a few bus stops up the road". We're just not sure what the
>>bus looks like yet (to painfully extend the metaphor).
>>
>>We're still wrestling with our relationship to RDF. If you're interested
>>in Chandler and how we're handling data, you might be interested in:
>>http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/DataModel
>>http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/OsafRepositoryNexus
>>
>>We're still pretty early in the design and development process (we hope
>>to be highly iterative). I'll check back in when we have a more coherent
>>proposal regarding our data model, our repository, and its relationship
>>to RDF. (Also, when we have a more fully functional calendar ui.) In the
>>meantime, we're definitely open to discussion/feedback about these issues.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Katie
>>
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 18:06:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 25 March 2005 11:20:43 GMT