W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Chandler Calendar

From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:39:55 +0100 (BST)
To: Katie Capps Parlante <capps@osafoundation.org>
cc: www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304231638020.19543-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>


Thanks for delurking Katie :)
Perhaps you could tell us about Chandler and RDF in an IRC chat
sometime?

Libby

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:

>
> Hello all,
>
> I thought I'd introduce myself. I'm Katie Capps Parlante, and I'm
> working at OSAF on Chandler's calendar parcel, among other things.
>
> I've been lurking on this list for a few months, and have generally been
> paying attention to your work. Many thanks, actually, its really helped
> me get my head around RDF and some calendar issues.
>
> Indeed, RDF is very similar in spirit to what we want to do with
> Chandler, "a few bus stops up the road". We're just not sure what the
> bus looks like yet (to painfully extend the metaphor).
>
> We're still wrestling with our relationship to RDF. If you're interested
> in Chandler and how we're handling data, you might be interested in:
> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/DataModel
> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/OsafRepositoryNexus
>
> We're still pretty early in the design and development process (we hope
> to be highly iterative). I'll check back in when we have a more coherent
> proposal regarding our data model, our repository, and its relationship
> to RDF. (Also, when we have a more fully functional calendar ui.) In the
> meantime, we're definitely open to discussion/feedback about these issues.
>
> Cheers,
> Katie
>
> Danny Ayers wrote:
>  > Just a heads-up that the Chandler PIM version 0.1 is now available.
>  >
>  > http://blogs.osafoundation.org/mitch/000166.html#000166
>  >
>  > Of particular interest here is CalendarIssues:
>  >
>  > http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/CalendarIssues
>  >
>  > They've been talking of RDF from the start, but I've not really found yet
>  > how it currently fits into their big picture. (There's quite a lot of
> talk
>  > about items & attributes, which sounds very like a few bus stops back
> up the
>  > road to RDF).
>  >
>  > Cheers,
>  > Danny.
>  >
>  > ----
>  >
>  > http://dannyayers.com
>  >
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 11:41:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:11 UTC