W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-calendar@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Chandler Calendar

From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:16:18 +0100 (BST)
To: Katie Capps Parlante <capps@osafoundation.org>
cc: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-calendar <www-rdf-calendar@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304252312500.6984-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>


Thanks Katie! I'll ping you in a week or two when I come to do the next
meeting agenda, if that's ok (the next meeting is 2003-05-14, 1600UTC):

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=14&month=5&year=2003&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=0

Libby

On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:

> Hi Libby.
>
> Sure, I'd be glad to talk about Chandler and RDF in an IRC chat sometime.
>
> Cheers,
> Katie
>
> Libby Miller wrote:
> > Thanks for delurking Katie :)
> > Perhaps you could tell us about Chandler and RDF in an IRC chat
> > sometime?
> >
> > Libby
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello all,
> >>
> >>I thought I'd introduce myself. I'm Katie Capps Parlante, and I'm
> >>working at OSAF on Chandler's calendar parcel, among other things.
> >>
> >>I've been lurking on this list for a few months, and have generally been
> >>paying attention to your work. Many thanks, actually, its really helped
> >>me get my head around RDF and some calendar issues.
> >>
> >>Indeed, RDF is very similar in spirit to what we want to do with
> >>Chandler, "a few bus stops up the road". We're just not sure what the
> >>bus looks like yet (to painfully extend the metaphor).
> >>
> >>We're still wrestling with our relationship to RDF. If you're interested
> >>in Chandler and how we're handling data, you might be interested in:
> >>http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/DataModel
> >>http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Main/OsafRepositoryNexus
> >>
> >>We're still pretty early in the design and development process (we hope
> >>to be highly iterative). I'll check back in when we have a more coherent
> >>proposal regarding our data model, our repository, and its relationship
> >>to RDF. (Also, when we have a more fully functional calendar ui.) In the
> >>meantime, we're definitely open to discussion/feedback about these issues.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Katie
> >>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 18:18:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:11 UTC