W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > January 2002

Re: W3C's XHTML QA plan

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:34:11 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101204b87b101a6475@[]>
To: Andrew Thackrah <andrew@opengroup.org>, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Cc: <www-qa@w3.org>, <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, <mimasa@w3.org>, "Shane P. McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
At 15:28 +0000 2002-01-23, Andrew Thackrah wrote:
>My question is the second one (process). The reason I ask wrt XHTML is
>because this is one of the areas in which my group has already done work
>and we want to know what the rules are for contributing.
>Looks like Nokia are in the same position (?)

Until now, there's no indication of a formal process to send Test 
Cases to do the HTML working group.

Waiting for this process from the HTML WG, you have the possibility 
to submit test to the *public* mailing list with a meaningful title 
for each submission and it will make a kind of archive when the 
process will be in place.


I know that the HTML WG is working on a test suite, but it's 
difficult to have information on it. Shane P. McCarron (ApTest and WG 
member) sent me an email in november about such a test suite.

	"We have initiated a test suite development project associated with
the HTML Working Group.  As the test suite matures (approximately 12
weeks after we actually start development) we will be making it
available to the W3C for use."

I don't know what "available to the W3C for use" includes. Maybe 
Masayasu can explain a bit, or Shane.
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 10:05:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:29 UTC